Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Monday, December 20, 2010
1. The language barrier.
2. The seclusion of the environment for female students.
3. The Interchange books are not understandable and grammar rules based.
4. Students cannot relate to different units in the Interchange books because most of the students have not been away from home or travelled abroad.
5. The write up is not proper English but it is American slang.
6. When the students cannot even write simple words without making mistakes, how do you expect them to write sentences or paragraphs and also be able to speak good English by the end of the course?
Solutions:
To solve these problems we need to concentrate on what are the best solutions from which the students can benefit almost 100%.
When new students take their Entry Test and are put into sections, they need to have a short course in basic simple rules of English Grammar, in which they can learn what a subject is, what is an object, verbs, adverbs, tenses, adjectives, nouns, pronouns, predicates etc. etc..... Only then they can understand what the units are telling them and what the teachers are asking them to do.
When we say ''Students should always come first,'' then we should all make the efforts to revise the teaching material and try to find such material that is in the best interest of the students. No matter how good your Methodology is or how brilliant a teacher you are, if the basic structure (the books) are not upto the capability standard of the students, then only a few students will reap the rewards while the rest will dwindle away without tasting the fruits of learning.
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Friday, December 17, 2010
Talk a Lot
You can download this book from this link:
Download.com
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Monday, November 1, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
What is Marcos or Marco anyway? Maybe it's a type of bird, maybe it's a fruit--who knows? Obviously not someone just climbing the ladder of proficiency in regards to the English language--someone who has absolutely no experience with Latin-derived names of Spanish origin. Marcos is. Marcos are. Unless this Marcos is engaging in an undeniably human act in the sentence, has this student really gotten the answer wrong? Does she deserve not to receive a point for applying grammar correctly when, in fact, she quite honestly, absolutely has?
In the wake--and yes, I do not use the term "wake" lightly here--I've been mulling over the finer points of bias in assessment. In fact, just today, one of the other teachers approached me with possible items for her next quiz, and we both identified a number of "biased" questions.
My experience with standardized testing in general (both as a parent and educator) tells me that bias is unavoidable to some extent. However, speaking specifically for the context we're now operating in, what steps can we take to minimize the above?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Learning Difficulties
Another problem is that of retention. They learn and produce sentences in a class or on a day but next day they come to class with a clean slate. Probably the reason is that prep year being too intensive. All subjects hours added together come to about more than 30 a week. Their daily schedule is packed. They are stuffed with more than what they can digest daily. After 6-7 hours of lessons daily, they are saturated in the evening and probably never touch their books outside the classroom. I tried to motivate my class to study and revise their English Lessons for at least 45 minutes daily, hoping that it may lead to the habit of independent and autonomous home study. Hope they may start doing it.
Then I'm trying to give more attention to the students who are, let me call it '-1' level of the prep year. Meaning that they are not at the level of language proficiency where we expect them at the beginning of the university prep year. Among these students, we have three types. Type 1 are those who, though at a lower level of the language proficiency, are trying hard to catch up and learn English. They, at the begging of the semester, can hardly speak a word or understand the instruction of the teacher. But through persistent motivation and encouragement by the teacher, they achieve a metamorphosis at the end of the semester and start communicating in broken and basic English with the teacher, and also pass all components of the assessment. Type 2 of the level are those who have the capacity to be at par with type 1, but they have least interest in college studies, and one wonders why are they here as students. Such students need a consistent push by the teacher, towards the end of the semester some of them become type 1 and pass. Type 3 are those who genuinely want to improve and continue with their study. However, previous education has done little good to them, and they are even below level '-1'. They make a great effort and one can see them bewildered but struggling. Sometimes, in their moments of hopefulness and hopelessness, they will bring a translator to the teacher, requesting and invoking his kindness, and requesting to pass them. They hope that whatever marks they may get; the teacher will add something from his own 'kitty' to their marks and make them progress to the next level of the prep year. For such students the time of 16 weeks is not enough to improve. They never reach the finishing line of the learning, though they keep on running. They fail and ultimately leave the institution. I think for them the semester should be of 8 months rather than of 4 months, and they should take a start from the very very basic level (even below intro level).
Finally, language learning is not learning a maths sum or formula. Language learning is acquisition and the process is not abrupt and quick fix kind. Sometimes, teacher feels exasperated with students that they are not learning which in my opinion is not the right approach. A student may not display any visible or palpable signs of learning but still he/she has learned something at the end of the class. In language learning, it takes time to put all pieces together and come out with production. We should keep on working with the students encouraging them; motivating them; and lauding them -even for their mistakes as at least the student has made an effort, and effort ultimately leads to yielding some fruit.
(Ignore mistakes in the post as is not revised after typing)
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Games in Language Teaching
During the last two weeks we dealt with, among other grammatical topics, forming yes/no questions using verbs to be and verbs to do. So I used a game in which the students practised these questions while enjoying a game that they've always enjoyed at home or in school - but in Arabic. They did their best to win the competition. And here is how it went.
1. I divided the class into two groups: A and B.
2. A student from Group A came to the front of the class, thinking about an object.
3. The members of Group B had to identify that object by asking only 15 yes/no questions.
4. The roles were shifted: A student from Group B received questions from Group A.
5. The group that succeeded in identifying more objects won.
6. We played the same game a second time altering the target into famous persons.
Rules of the game:
1. Only yes/no questions can be used. The use of "or" is not allowed.
2. Only short answers can be given; no additional information or hints can be provided.
3. Only well-formed questions will be answered.
The students, and myself, enjoyed the game. They struggled to form correct questions in order to win. They also did their best to think about things or persons that were difficult for the other group to guess. At the beginning, the answers were very easy to figure out: necklace, iPhone, Mickael Jackson, Tamir Husni (an Arab singer and actor), etc. In a later stage, they became more difficult: a flat screen (not a computer), Usama Al-Sayyed (an Arab chef), Al-Hudhaifi (a Saudi Da'iya), etc.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Moodle
On a side note: I have to say, I appreciate and admire the willingness of the students here to read out loud despite (sometimes marked) difficulties in pronunciation, comprehension, etc. Students rarely seem to feel threatened or embarrassed in the presence of peers--and besides being immensely grateful for the above, I'm wondering why/how? Is the school-culture here really that different from the US where in a similar context, the ones with lower proficiency basically keep their ears tucked into their shoes the entire class session? (At any rate, they certainly don't wave their hands and compete to participate.) Or maybe...the difference is in the stakes between the two contexts. In any case, how can I further harness this advantage, as I see it? I'm still assimilating (to YUC, to the student population, to EFL), and I've noticed that certain strategies that were effective back home are not so here and vice versa....
Monday, October 4, 2010
Arabic-speaking learners of English and verbs to be
When those students become aware of the importance of the use of verbs to be in English, there appears another problem which is overusing those verbs. As a result, many students - I insist on 'many' - would say, "He is work in a school," wrongly inserting a verb to be before a present simple verb.
Coursebook Issues
To read more about the issue click on the link below
Connecting the Course Book
Textbook: Supplementation
Sunday, October 3, 2010
What to Share/Post about
- We may post our views and comments about the textbook that we are using, and how we would like it to be different from what it is now.
- We may discuss the problems which our students face with learning particular language structures or functions.
- We may post about the developments in the field of English language teaching.
- We may share links and resources.
- We may like to share new ideas and suggestions.
- We may like to share the motivation issues of the students.